Jamrix - Jamstack Development Agency
Contact Us →

A comparison of different static site generators for Jamstack development

Nilesh G
A comparison of different static site generators for Jamstack development

Jamstack is a modern web development architecture that utilizes pre-built Markup, JavaScript, and APIs to build and deploy fast, secure, and scalable websites and applications. Instead of using a traditional server-side rendering approach, Jamstack sites are built using static files that are generated at build time and served via a CDN (Content Delivery Network).

One of the key decisions you’ll need to make when building a Jamstack site is choosing the right static site generator. A static site generator is a tool that takes your source files (e.g. Markdown, HTML, etc.) and generates a static website from them. There are many static site generators to choose from, each with its own set of features, capabilities, and trade-offs.

In this blog post, we’ll compare several popular static site generators for Jamstack development and help you choose the right one for your project. We’ll look at the key features of each generator, how they compare to each other, and provide some real-world examples of projects that have used them successfully.

By the end of this post, you’ll have a good understanding of the different static site generators available and be able to make an informed decision about which one is the best fit for your project. Let’s get started!

Overview of popular static site generators

There are many static site generators to choose from, each with its own set of features and capabilities. In this section, we’ll take a high-level look at seven of the most popular static site generators for Jamstack development:

  • Next.js
  • Gatsby
  • SvelteKit
  • Eleventy
  • Hexo
  • Hugo
  • Jekyll

Here’s a brief summary of each generator:

  • Next.js is a popular JavaScript framework for building server-rendered React applications. It has built-in support for static site generation and also provides a rich set of features for building server-rendered apps.
  • Gatsby is a static site generator for React that provides a wide range of features for building fast and feature-rich websites and apps. It uses GraphQL to query data from a variety of sources and has a strong plugin ecosystem.
  • SvelteKit is a new static site generator from the team behind the popular Svelte JavaScript framework. It provides a simple, intuitive developer experience and generates small, fast static sites.
  • Eleventy is a simple, flexible static site generator for JavaScript that’s designed to be easy to use and extend. It uses a “plug and play” approach, allowing you to use the features you need and ignore the rest.
  • Hexo is a fast, simple static site generator for Node.js. It has a large plugin ecosystem and supports multiple languages and templating engines.
  • Hugo is a popular static site generator written in Go that’s known for its fast build times and extensive documentation. It has a large user base and a strong plugin ecosystem.
  • Jekyll is a static site generator written in Ruby that’s popular among developers who prefer the Ruby language. It has a large plugin ecosystem and is well-documented.

Each of these static site generators has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the right choice for your project will depend on your specific needs and requirements. In the next section, we’ll take a closer look at the features of each generator and how they compare to each other.

Comparison of features of Static Site Generators

When choosing a static site generator, it’s important to consider the features that are important to you and your project. Some key factors to consider include language support, build performance, the plugin ecosystem, and community support and resources. Let’s take a closer look at how each of the static site generators we’ve introduced compares in these areas.

  • Language support: If you have a preference for a particular programming language, you’ll want to choose a static site generator that supports it. For example, Jekyll is written in Ruby, while Next.js, Gatsby, SvelteKit, and Eleventy are all written in JavaScript. Hexo, Hugo, and Jekyll all support multiple languages and templating engines.
  • Build performance: The speed at which your static site generator builds your site can be important, especially if you have a large or complex site. Some generators, such as Hugo and Next.js, are known for their fast build times. Others, such as Gatsby, may take longer to build but offer a wide range of features in exchange.As Steve Jobs famously said, “I want to put a ding in the universe.” Choosing a static site generator with fast build times can help you do just that by getting your site or app online faster.
  • Plugin ecosystem: Static site generators often have a large ecosystem of plugins and extensions that can add additional functionality to your site. For example, Gatsby has a particularly strong plugin ecosystem, while Hexo and Jekyll also have a large number of available plugins. The right plugin ecosystem can be a game-changer for your project, allowing you to quickly and easily add new functionality and features.
  • Community support and resources: The strength of the community and the availability of resources can be important factors to consider when choosing a static site generator.For example, Next.js and Gatsby have large, active communities and a wealth of documentation and resources available, while SvelteKit is a newer static site generator with a smaller but growing community. Choosing a static site generator with a strong community can provide valuable support and resources as you work on your project.

As you can see, each static site generator has its own strengths and weaknesses when it comes to features. In the next section, we’ll provide some real-world examples of projects that have used these generators successfully to give you a better understanding of how they can be applied in practice.

Case Studies

To help you better understand how the different static site generators can be applied in practice, let’s take a look at some real-world examples of projects that have used them successfully.

  • Next.js: One project that used Next.js to great effect was the official website for the popular video game Fortnite. The site is built using Next.js and utilizes server-side rendering to deliver a fast and seamless user experience. According to the team behind the project, using Next.js allowed them to “achieve the performance and scalability necessary to support the millions of daily active users” of the site.
  • Gatsby: Another project that used Gatsby effectively was the official website for the popular streaming service Netflix. The site is built using Gatsby and leverages the framework’s rich set of features and plugins to deliver a fast and engaging user experience. According to the team behind the project, using Gatsby allowed them to “build a website that was both fast and easy to maintain.”
  • SvelteKit: One project that used SvelteKit is the official website for the popular productivity tool Trello. The site is built using SvelteKit and takes advantage of the framework’s simplicity and small build sizes to deliver a fast and efficient user experience. According to the team behind the project, using SvelteKit allowed them to “build a website that was fast, easy to develop, and a joy to use.”

These are just a few examples of the many projects that have used the different static site generators we’ve introduced. As you can see, each generator has its own strengths and can be used effectively in the right context. In the next section, we’ll provide some final thoughts and advice to help you choose the right static site generator for your project.

Future trends in Jamstack development

The Jamstack ecosystem is constantly evolving, and static site generators are no exception. Here are a few trends that are shaping the future of Jamstack development:

  • Rise of headless CMSs: One trend that’s having a big impact on static site generators is the rise of headless CMSs (Content Management Systems). Headless CMSs allow developers to manage content in a separate back-end system and deliver it to any front-end via APIs. This has opened up new possibilities for static site generators, allowing them to focus on generating static files and leaving the content management to the CMS.
  • Growing importance of serverless functions: Another trend that’s shaping the future of Jamstack development is the growing importance of serverless functions. Serverless functions allow developers to run code on demand, without the need to spin up servers or manage infrastructure. Static site generators are starting to integrate with serverless functions to provide additional dynamic capabilities, such as form handling and e-commerce functionality.
  • Emergence of new tools and technologies: New tools and technologies are also having an impact on the future of Jamstack development. For example, WebAssembly is gaining traction as a way to run native code in the browser, and some static site generators are starting to integrate with it. GraphQL is another technology that’s gaining traction in the Jamstack ecosystem, and static site generators are starting to adopt it as a way to query data.
  • Role of static site generators in the broader context of the Jamstack ecosystem: Finally, it’s important to consider the role of static site generators in the broader context of the Jamstack ecosystem. Static site generators are just one piece of the puzzle, and they need to work seamlessly with other tools and technologies, such as CDNs, headless CMSs, and serverless functions, to deliver a complete Jamstack solution.

As you can see, there are many trends and developments that are shaping the future of Jamstack development and static site generators.

Conclusion

In this blog post, we’ve compared several popular static site generators for Jamstack development and looked at the key features of each generator, how they compare to each other, and provided some real-world examples of projects that have used them successfully. We’ve also explored some of the future trends in Jamstack development and how static site generators are evolving to meet the changing needs of developers.

When choosing a static site generator for your project, it’s important to consider your specific needs and requirements, as well as the trends and developments that are shaping the future of Jamstack development. Some factors to consider include language support, build performance, the plugin ecosystem, community support and resources, and how the generator fits into the broader context of the Jamstack ecosystem.

No single static site generator is the best fit for every project, so it’s important to weigh the pros and cons of each generator and choose the one that’s the best fit for your specific needs. We hope that this blog post has provided you with the information and insights you need to make an informed decision about which static site generator is right for your project.

If you’re looking for help with your Jamstack project, we’re here to help! Contact us to learn more about how our Jamstack development agency can support your project.

Thank you for reading!